digital distribution

Often in major changes in either production or distribution technology, there is a phase where supply and demand renegotiate a new price level agreement.

We all have a computer at home that we paid for, we all have our ISP account that we monthly pay for, with the router we paid for, and cables our society paid for from our taxes, and satellites our governments decided to put up there. “We” as global community paid for and developed and built a global digital network, that makes everything easier and faster and cheaper because there is no truck or airplane or shop-shelf, Sony and pals get to use all that free of charge, that makes their promotion and distribution also cheaper, faster, easier.

Sony and pals do use the digital distribution network but continued to charge shop-shelf prices. The abuse of the digital network as such is largely on the part of the music and movie industry.

To put it in perspective : if I sit outside a bar and some waiter comes and asks what i want to drink and gets my drinks and keeps an eye to see when my glass is empty and asks if i want something else or offers the daily lunch, i give the man a tip, 15% or more.

If the bar has no waiter, i dont pay a tip.

If companies charge shop-shelf price in a digital market, you can expect a wave of ‘hacking’ and illegal versions flooding the market, mainly due to dissatisfaction with the perceived overcharging by the suppliers. P2P-networks were the chosen platform for a while, or sites like YouTube. It continues until the market reaches a new price level agreement between supply and demand, or a new business model.

Steve Jobs finally introduced iTunes, 12 songs for 12 dollars, a completely legal digital distribution network. That is for music close to the old price level, just without the cost for the case, transport, and shop shelf (we are going to miss Steve Jobs).

Posted in juust | Leave a comment

the wrath of grapes

An interesting verdict in a case before the dutch court in Den Bosch, where a liquor store union sued LimonCello.Nu, a webshop selling liquor from a storage facility on an industry terrain. The court ruled the webshop is a retail shop and should be run from a location designated for retail in stead of an industrial location. LimonCello from the AxSys group has a permit to sell liquor, but the union represents mostly conventional retail shops.

This seems interesting as a conflict between the old and new business model. This was the first verdict, I suspect there might be some appeals as the verdict could serve as precedent to force any dutch webshop to rent commercial retail real estate, that nullifies their main competitive advantage and increases the threshold to set up shop. Online retailers from other countries don’t have the problem, so it would also weaken our competitive position in the international online retail market.

I think a lot pf people will want the court to add some nuances :)

Posted in sem | Tagged | 2 Comments

contact us

I read somewhere on BHW that Google have 25 billion pages indexed. Whilst scr*ping I wondered how many pages the phrase ‘contact us’ has, so I checked it and it has 5 billion. Then I saw the serp in Google where right above the White House and Google is the Boston Herald page.

contact us google

contact us google

I really wonder how Matt and company figure that one in terms of relevance to the query.

Posted in google | Tagged | Leave a comment